<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Edwards buzz share does the limbo: How low can you go?</title>
	<link>http://wonkoblog.com/2008/01/11/edwards-buzz-share-does-the-limbo-how-low-can-you-go/</link>
	<description>Official Blog of Wonkosphere.com</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: pixelicious</title>
		<link>http://wonkoblog.com/2008/01/11/edwards-buzz-share-does-the-limbo-how-low-can-you-go/#comment-329</link>
		<author>pixelicious</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wonkoblog.com/2008/01/11/edwards-buzz-share-does-the-limbo-how-low-can-you-go/#comment-329</guid>
		<description>Holy cow. Did it ever occur to anyone that the reason Edwards isn't getting much buzz is that Obama and Clinton are more interesting? Did it ever occur to anyone that  there is negative buzz out there because people don't buy the populist b.s. when the guy gets $400 haircuts and lives in a 28,000 square foot house? And did it ever occur to anyone that the reason Obama and Clinton have more delegates is because they have mobilized their supporters, rather than whining about which media are "fair" and which are not? 

And BTW, what exactly is "irresponsible" about trying to include Kos and getting shut down? I take Wonker at his word, that he has not gotten anywhere contacting Kos to include the diaries. 

If your goal is to get Edwards' buzz to be more accurately represented, wouldn't the smarter course of action be to lobby Kos to get them to respond to Wonker's requests? But then again, that's actually trying to fix the problem, not just bellyache about it, so you may not want to do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy cow. Did it ever occur to anyone that the reason Edwards isn&#8217;t getting much buzz is that Obama and Clinton are more interesting? Did it ever occur to anyone that  there is negative buzz out there because people don&#8217;t buy the populist b.s. when the guy gets $400 haircuts and lives in a 28,000 square foot house? And did it ever occur to anyone that the reason Obama and Clinton have more delegates is because they have mobilized their supporters, rather than whining about which media are &#8220;fair&#8221; and which are not? </p>
<p>And BTW, what exactly is &#8220;irresponsible&#8221; about trying to include Kos and getting shut down? I take Wonker at his word, that he has not gotten anywhere contacting Kos to include the diaries. </p>
<p>If your goal is to get Edwards&#8217; buzz to be more accurately represented, wouldn&#8217;t the smarter course of action be to lobby Kos to get them to respond to Wonker&#8217;s requests? But then again, that&#8217;s actually trying to fix the problem, not just bellyache about it, so you may not want to do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liberaldemdave</title>
		<link>http://wonkoblog.com/2008/01/11/edwards-buzz-share-does-the-limbo-how-low-can-you-go/#comment-323</link>
		<author>liberaldemdave</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 05:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wonkoblog.com/2008/01/11/edwards-buzz-share-does-the-limbo-how-low-can-you-go/#comment-323</guid>
		<description>68 Diaries in 24 hours... Oh, but there's no "buzz" re: Edwards in the blogosphere. (/snark)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>68 Diaries in 24 hours&#8230; Oh, but there&#8217;s no &#8220;buzz&#8221; re: Edwards in the blogosphere. (/snark)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liberaldemdave</title>
		<link>http://wonkoblog.com/2008/01/11/edwards-buzz-share-does-the-limbo-how-low-can-you-go/#comment-322</link>
		<author>liberaldemdave</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 05:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wonkoblog.com/2008/01/11/edwards-buzz-share-does-the-limbo-how-low-can-you-go/#comment-322</guid>
		<description>Sorry, wonker but that's just irresponsible on the part of wonkoblog. Perhaps before "you people" try to trash and marginalize John Edwards, perhaps someone should sign up for a dKos or MyDD account and sort by tags. Try this on for size, from dKos in the last 24 hours:

Recent Diaries
Sort By Tag: Time:
Tag:

Tag: John Edwards (All Tags)
Reaching Across The Aisle
by cpa1

33 comments (33 new)
Shut the "F" Up.
by revelwoodie

156 comments (156 new)
Lawrence O' Donnell is a Loser
by Michael 4 Edwards

28 comments (2 new)
This is not a "Let's transcend presidential primary...
by sad pony guerilla girl

15 comments (15 new)
Edwards Evening News RoundUp: the Fight for America's Middle...
by jamess

218 comments (218 new)
I just voted for John Edwards
by lbrasington

25 comments (18 new)
Personal story of being screwed by corporations
by mnhtnbb

61 comments (61 new)
War and peace
by Texas Populist

14 comments (14 new)
I've Hated/Loved the Clintons Since . . . .
by gchaucer2

120 comments (120 new)
Which Dem will prosecute BushCo's crimes?
by Veritas78

35 comments (35 new)
The Edwards Netroots Insurrection
by BruceMcF

347 comments (23 new)
New Hampshire Reactions
by Ms. American Pie

6 comments (6 new)
Enough with the Bullshit, Kossacks
by autoegocrat

43 comments (43 new)
John Edwards is pi$$ing off all the right people.
by JedReport

258 comments (258 new)
Political Jiu-jitsu – Embracing Right-Wing Talking...
by inflector

12 comments (12 new)
Where is Foreign Policy beyond the Middle East?
by ceti

3 comments (3 new)
Poll: Who did you support last time vs. this time?
by oscarsmom

116 comments (116 new)
I'm worried
by david mizner

586 comments (586 new)
Today with Senator Feingold
by Spruce

13 comments (13 new)
Union Support Drifting Towards Obama
by icebergslim

43 comments (43 new)
John Edwards is FOR REAL
by James Kroeger

24 comments (24 new)
The Nataline Sarkisyan case -- blown out of proportion?
by Eternal Hope

12 comments (12 new)
Edwards supporter with genuine question for Clinton and Obama ...
by Ruby K

29 comments (29 new)
Black V. White, Obama V. Clinton
by DAVE DIAL

39 comments (39 new)
Edwards Will Win. Kossacks Will Destroy Obama and Clinton
by FischFry

41 comments (41 new)
The Huffington Post Publishes Racist Tirade
by Garden Neighbor

59 comments (59 new)
Lawrence O'Donnell is an idiot
by GUGA

22 comments (22 new)
Nevada teachers to block Hotel Worker’s Union Vote in...
by Frederik

57 comments (57 new)
The Mushroom Party
by Wally in Miami

18 comments (18 new)
CNN Declares Edwards candidacy is dead
by bushsux

106 comments (106 new)
The MSM and Hillary
by NY Writer

17 comments (17 new)
Bill Maher Returned Tonight - John Edwards
by AntonBursch

427 comments (60 new)
To Hell With 11th Commandment
by kwAwk

18 comments (18 new)
To Change the System, Stop Taking Their Money
by sagewater2

8 comments (8 new)
To Change the System, Stop Taking Their Money
by sagewater2

8 comments (8 new)
Edwards/Clinton '08
by GunLovinDem

58 comments (58 new)
The Danger Is McCain.
by Phoenix Woman

126 comments (126 new)
A few things I think
by jmcl89

3 comments (3 new)
3 Facts on Michigan Dem Primary: No Write Ins, Many voting ...
by BobAlex06

6 comments (6 new)
Take Edwards' voice you take my voice
by Ellinorianne

20 comments (17 new)
Edwards Evening News Roundup: A Fighter for Working America
by sarahlane

292 comments (276 new)
San Diego Chargers MUST withdraw from playoffs NOW
by Clem Yeobright

78 comments (78 new)
John Edwards Eats Babies
by Mordecai

19 comments (3 new)
Please, let's all just try to be nice.
by angrybird

10 comments (10 new)
A friend writes. . . .
by Red Wind

23 comments (23 new)
Why Senators Obama and Clinton should join forces.
by rrheard

81 comments (81 new)
edwards should bow out to stop hillary.
by skyterrain

109 comments (109 new)
Why Do We Value Electability?
by politicalteen89

20 comments (20 new)
Big Business puts John Edwards on Notice
by jamess

329 comments (152 new)
Is It Implausible that either Clinton or Obama will Stumble?
by BruceMcF

68 comments (68 new</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, wonker but that&#8217;s just irresponsible on the part of wonkoblog. Perhaps before &#8220;you people&#8221; try to trash and marginalize John Edwards, perhaps someone should sign up for a dKos or MyDD account and sort by tags. Try this on for size, from dKos in the last 24 hours:</p>
<p>Recent Diaries<br />
Sort By Tag: Time:<br />
Tag:</p>
<p>Tag: John Edwards (All Tags)<br />
Reaching Across The Aisle<br />
by cpa1</p>
<p>33 comments (33 new)<br />
Shut the &#8220;F&#8221; Up.<br />
by revelwoodie</p>
<p>156 comments (156 new)<br />
Lawrence O&#8217; Donnell is a Loser<br />
by Michael 4 Edwards</p>
<p>28 comments (2 new)<br />
This is not a &#8220;Let&#8217;s transcend presidential primary&#8230;<br />
by sad pony guerilla girl</p>
<p>15 comments (15 new)<br />
Edwards Evening News RoundUp: the Fight for America&#8217;s Middle&#8230;<br />
by jamess</p>
<p>218 comments (218 new)<br />
I just voted for John Edwards<br />
by lbrasington</p>
<p>25 comments (18 new)<br />
Personal story of being screwed by corporations<br />
by mnhtnbb</p>
<p>61 comments (61 new)<br />
War and peace<br />
by Texas Populist</p>
<p>14 comments (14 new)<br />
I&#8217;ve Hated/Loved the Clintons Since . . . .<br />
by gchaucer2</p>
<p>120 comments (120 new)<br />
Which Dem will prosecute BushCo&#8217;s crimes?<br />
by Veritas78</p>
<p>35 comments (35 new)<br />
The Edwards Netroots Insurrection<br />
by BruceMcF</p>
<p>347 comments (23 new)<br />
New Hampshire Reactions<br />
by Ms. American Pie</p>
<p>6 comments (6 new)<br />
Enough with the Bullshit, Kossacks<br />
by autoegocrat</p>
<p>43 comments (43 new)<br />
John Edwards is pi$$ing off all the right people.<br />
by JedReport</p>
<p>258 comments (258 new)<br />
Political Jiu-jitsu – Embracing Right-Wing Talking&#8230;<br />
by inflector</p>
<p>12 comments (12 new)<br />
Where is Foreign Policy beyond the Middle East?<br />
by ceti</p>
<p>3 comments (3 new)<br />
Poll: Who did you support last time vs. this time?<br />
by oscarsmom</p>
<p>116 comments (116 new)<br />
I&#8217;m worried<br />
by david mizner</p>
<p>586 comments (586 new)<br />
Today with Senator Feingold<br />
by Spruce</p>
<p>13 comments (13 new)<br />
Union Support Drifting Towards Obama<br />
by icebergslim</p>
<p>43 comments (43 new)<br />
John Edwards is FOR REAL<br />
by James Kroeger</p>
<p>24 comments (24 new)<br />
The Nataline Sarkisyan case &#8212; blown out of proportion?<br />
by Eternal Hope</p>
<p>12 comments (12 new)<br />
Edwards supporter with genuine question for Clinton and Obama &#8230;<br />
by Ruby K</p>
<p>29 comments (29 new)<br />
Black V. White, Obama V. Clinton<br />
by DAVE DIAL</p>
<p>39 comments (39 new)<br />
Edwards Will Win. Kossacks Will Destroy Obama and Clinton<br />
by FischFry</p>
<p>41 comments (41 new)<br />
The Huffington Post Publishes Racist Tirade<br />
by Garden Neighbor</p>
<p>59 comments (59 new)<br />
Lawrence O&#8217;Donnell is an idiot<br />
by GUGA</p>
<p>22 comments (22 new)<br />
Nevada teachers to block Hotel Worker’s Union Vote in&#8230;<br />
by Frederik</p>
<p>57 comments (57 new)<br />
The Mushroom Party<br />
by Wally in Miami</p>
<p>18 comments (18 new)<br />
CNN Declares Edwards candidacy is dead<br />
by bushsux</p>
<p>106 comments (106 new)<br />
The MSM and Hillary<br />
by NY Writer</p>
<p>17 comments (17 new)<br />
Bill Maher Returned Tonight - John Edwards<br />
by AntonBursch</p>
<p>427 comments (60 new)<br />
To Hell With 11th Commandment<br />
by kwAwk</p>
<p>18 comments (18 new)<br />
To Change the System, Stop Taking Their Money<br />
by sagewater2</p>
<p>8 comments (8 new)<br />
To Change the System, Stop Taking Their Money<br />
by sagewater2</p>
<p>8 comments (8 new)<br />
Edwards/Clinton &#8216;08<br />
by GunLovinDem</p>
<p>58 comments (58 new)<br />
The Danger Is McCain.<br />
by Phoenix Woman</p>
<p>126 comments (126 new)<br />
A few things I think<br />
by jmcl89</p>
<p>3 comments (3 new)<br />
3 Facts on Michigan Dem Primary: No Write Ins, Many voting &#8230;<br />
by BobAlex06</p>
<p>6 comments (6 new)<br />
Take Edwards&#8217; voice you take my voice<br />
by Ellinorianne</p>
<p>20 comments (17 new)<br />
Edwards Evening News Roundup: A Fighter for Working America<br />
by sarahlane</p>
<p>292 comments (276 new)<br />
San Diego Chargers MUST withdraw from playoffs NOW<br />
by Clem Yeobright</p>
<p>78 comments (78 new)<br />
John Edwards Eats Babies<br />
by Mordecai</p>
<p>19 comments (3 new)<br />
Please, let&#8217;s all just try to be nice.<br />
by angrybird</p>
<p>10 comments (10 new)<br />
A friend writes. . . .<br />
by Red Wind</p>
<p>23 comments (23 new)<br />
Why Senators Obama and Clinton should join forces.<br />
by rrheard</p>
<p>81 comments (81 new)<br />
edwards should bow out to stop hillary.<br />
by skyterrain</p>
<p>109 comments (109 new)<br />
Why Do We Value Electability?<br />
by politicalteen89</p>
<p>20 comments (20 new)<br />
Big Business puts John Edwards on Notice<br />
by jamess</p>
<p>329 comments (152 new)<br />
Is It Implausible that either Clinton or Obama will Stumble?<br />
by BruceMcF</p>
<p>68 comments (68 new</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wonker</title>
		<link>http://wonkoblog.com/2008/01/11/edwards-buzz-share-does-the-limbo-how-low-can-you-go/#comment-320</link>
		<author>wonker</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 23:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wonkoblog.com/2008/01/11/edwards-buzz-share-does-the-limbo-how-low-can-you-go/#comment-320</guid>
		<description>The main feed from Daily Kos is included in our Directory and analysis; however the inidividual diaries are not.  We have tried to add them but they don't work and we have not been able to get a response from DK as to how to make it work.  WonkoKevin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main feed from Daily Kos is included in our Directory and analysis; however the inidividual diaries are not.  We have tried to add them but they don&#8217;t work and we have not been able to get a response from DK as to how to make it work.  WonkoKevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: figgypuddin</title>
		<link>http://wonkoblog.com/2008/01/11/edwards-buzz-share-does-the-limbo-how-low-can-you-go/#comment-317</link>
		<author>figgypuddin</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wonkoblog.com/2008/01/11/edwards-buzz-share-does-the-limbo-how-low-can-you-go/#comment-317</guid>
		<description>The time for talk is over; time to vote--we'll see then.  99% of what is talked about in MSM media and on the blogs is crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The time for talk is over; time to vote&#8211;we&#8217;ll see then.  99% of what is talked about in MSM media and on the blogs is crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldgringo</title>
		<link>http://wonkoblog.com/2008/01/11/edwards-buzz-share-does-the-limbo-how-low-can-you-go/#comment-316</link>
		<author>oldgringo</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wonkoblog.com/2008/01/11/edwards-buzz-share-does-the-limbo-how-low-can-you-go/#comment-316</guid>
		<description>Try as the "IN FOLKS" may, there is no escaping the fact that CORPORATE AMERICA and their OWNED MINNIONS in the Main Stream Media fear JOHN EDWARDS and his message ABOVE ALL ELSE on this planet including THE BUSH-BOOGGIEMEN-TERRISTS!
The BELT WAY ENTRENCED GANGS of BOTH PARTIES are doing their darnedest to shoot him down and kill him off in the primaries, because THEY KNOW that HE is the one who can and will TURN THIS MESS AROUND!
Bloggers who a taking cheap shots like this one are NOT SERVING THIS NATION IN ANY POSSITIVE WQY!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try as the &#8220;IN FOLKS&#8221; may, there is no escaping the fact that CORPORATE AMERICA and their OWNED MINNIONS in the Main Stream Media fear JOHN EDWARDS and his message ABOVE ALL ELSE on this planet including THE BUSH-BOOGGIEMEN-TERRISTS!<br />
The BELT WAY ENTRENCED GANGS of BOTH PARTIES are doing their darnedest to shoot him down and kill him off in the primaries, because THEY KNOW that HE is the one who can and will TURN THIS MESS AROUND!<br />
Bloggers who a taking cheap shots like this one are NOT SERVING THIS NATION IN ANY POSSITIVE WQY!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KimberlyFla</title>
		<link>http://wonkoblog.com/2008/01/11/edwards-buzz-share-does-the-limbo-how-low-can-you-go/#comment-315</link>
		<author>KimberlyFla</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wonkoblog.com/2008/01/11/edwards-buzz-share-does-the-limbo-how-low-can-you-go/#comment-315</guid>
		<description>Bill Maher was talking about John Edwards last night.  DailyKos has diaries posted everyday about Edwards.  Edwards is the best progressive candidate and I just emailed my kids and they are spreading the news on their FSU Campus.  Viva, John Edwards!  The man fighting for our middle class.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Maher was talking about John Edwards last night.  DailyKos has diaries posted everyday about Edwards.  Edwards is the best progressive candidate and I just emailed my kids and they are spreading the news on their FSU Campus.  Viva, John Edwards!  The man fighting for our middle class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: haiku1</title>
		<link>http://wonkoblog.com/2008/01/11/edwards-buzz-share-does-the-limbo-how-low-can-you-go/#comment-313</link>
		<author>haiku1</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wonkoblog.com/2008/01/11/edwards-buzz-share-does-the-limbo-how-low-can-you-go/#comment-313</guid>
		<description>It has absolutely amazed me that the MSM has so effectively shut Edwards out of the reporting.  It's like he doesn't fit into their story.  I too like his progressive positions, his strong, clearly articulated positions, and I am deeply suspicious of the other candidates who are drawing big corporate bucks and the white wine crowd, cheers from Republicans (!!!) in the case of Obama and support from almost every early-declaring elected official in the case of Clinton.  And now the internet?!?! I think it's a pity that Huffington Post, for example, seems to have erased Edwards as well--though they do link to this post.  Am I a racist or a sexist because I think that the candidate talking about inequality in America and money-driven politics in Washington deserves my support?  It seems to be coming to that if today's self-destructive blather on the blogs is any measure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has absolutely amazed me that the MSM has so effectively shut Edwards out of the reporting.  It&#8217;s like he doesn&#8217;t fit into their story.  I too like his progressive positions, his strong, clearly articulated positions, and I am deeply suspicious of the other candidates who are drawing big corporate bucks and the white wine crowd, cheers from Republicans (!!!) in the case of Obama and support from almost every early-declaring elected official in the case of Clinton.  And now the internet?!?! I think it&#8217;s a pity that Huffington Post, for example, seems to have erased Edwards as well&#8211;though they do link to this post.  Am I a racist or a sexist because I think that the candidate talking about inequality in America and money-driven politics in Washington deserves my support?  It seems to be coming to that if today&#8217;s self-destructive blather on the blogs is any measure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liberaldemdave</title>
		<link>http://wonkoblog.com/2008/01/11/edwards-buzz-share-does-the-limbo-how-low-can-you-go/#comment-312</link>
		<author>liberaldemdave</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 16:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wonkoblog.com/2008/01/11/edwards-buzz-share-does-the-limbo-how-low-can-you-go/#comment-312</guid>
		<description>I can only surmise that the heavy pro-Edwards traffic @ DailyKos, where John Edwards diaries are in the 10-20 per day range with comments in the 300-600 range just don't count?

John's in it for the long haul. There has been 1 caucus and 1 primary as of today (Saturday, 1/12)...I can't believe that now the blogosphere is jumping on the COM (Corporate Owned Media) bandwagon in its attempt to marginalize and eliminate John Edwards. 

He's in it all the way to the convention and his supporters, by and large, are staying with him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can only surmise that the heavy pro-Edwards traffic @ DailyKos, where John Edwards diaries are in the 10-20 per day range with comments in the 300-600 range just don&#8217;t count?</p>
<p>John&#8217;s in it for the long haul. There has been 1 caucus and 1 primary as of today (Saturday, 1/12)&#8230;I can&#8217;t believe that now the blogosphere is jumping on the COM (Corporate Owned Media) bandwagon in its attempt to marginalize and eliminate John Edwards. </p>
<p>He&#8217;s in it all the way to the convention and his supporters, by and large, are staying with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muzzyrudd</title>
		<link>http://wonkoblog.com/2008/01/11/edwards-buzz-share-does-the-limbo-how-low-can-you-go/#comment-310</link>
		<author>muzzyrudd</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wonkoblog.com/2008/01/11/edwards-buzz-share-does-the-limbo-how-low-can-you-go/#comment-310</guid>
		<description>OK, here is some Edwards buzz.  He is still the most electable and most progressive candidate in the field.  If his share of "buzz" as you say has fallen below some hypothetical critical mass then it is partly because you all in the blogsphere are acting like conventional media and following the lead of the corporate networks that are shutting him out.  We will fight on because it is the right thing to do and for some of us the necessary thing to do for our own survival.  We must have this system reformed for the survival of our families.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, here is some Edwards buzz.  He is still the most electable and most progressive candidate in the field.  If his share of &#8220;buzz&#8221; as you say has fallen below some hypothetical critical mass then it is partly because you all in the blogsphere are acting like conventional media and following the lead of the corporate networks that are shutting him out.  We will fight on because it is the right thing to do and for some of us the necessary thing to do for our own survival.  We must have this system reformed for the survival of our families.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
